THE CONSEQUENCES OF HANDING OVER POWER TO GOVERNMENT FROM A DIFFERENT POLITICAL PARTY TO ANOTHER
| Format: Ms Word | 1-5 Chapters | Table of Content|
INSTANT PROJECT MATERIAL DOWNLOAD
Study Level: BTech, BSc, BEng, BA, HND, ND or NCE
Amount: ₦3,000.00
ASTRACT
This work is on the consequences of handing over power to government from a different political party to another using the 2015 scenario where the incumbent PDP government Lost power to the APC. What are the consequences on the civil service?
In this work we set out questions that would guide us to the answer.
At the end of this work the research has shown that the there are the problems of handing over power to another political party on the Civil service, which included Change of policy and Change of power which slowed down productivity and activity in the civil service as they were not having a clear picture on the way things would go from there.
We also found out that there is a positive influence of handing over of power from PDP to APC Government on Nigeria citizens, Also that the relationship between handing over power from PDP to APC on Nigeria economy growth is generally positive.
ASTRACT
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS
1.8 ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Change
Governance
Democracy
Political Parties
Election/Representation
The Nexus between Political Parties and Representation
Theorizing Democracy, Governance and Change
PDP, Ideological and Organizational Flux
Opposition Parties: Consistency, Intellectual and Ideological Foundations, Consolidation and Drive.
Nigeria 2015 General Election and Change
APC, their Master Plan and Determination for Change
Governance and Expectation of Nigerians
APC and the Challenge of Governing without Opposition
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
INTRODUCTION
RESEARCH DESIGN
SOURCES OF DATA
POPULATION OF THE STUDY
SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
INSTRUMENTATION
VALIDATION OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
ADMINISTRATION OF THE INSTRUMENT
DATA COLLECTION
STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
INTRODUCTION
THE DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDENTS
RESEARCH ANALYSIS
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 SUMMARY
5.3 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
References
QUESTIONNAIRE
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
A change of administration following a general election tests both the quality and the effectiveness of government. This research examines how such transitions have worked in Nigeria in the past, at different levels of the Nigerian government and in comparable parliamentary systems of the nation. The main focus is on elections where a change of government was expected to occur. The formal handover from one administration to another has generally been relatively smooth and uncontentious for the last two decade. However, the wider transition covers a much longer period, beginning well before a general election is called, and continuing well into the first few weeks, months and years of a new administration (Riddell and Haddon, 2009).
Unlike other countries, transitions have not previously been studied in depth in Nigeria. There are many ways of measuring the success of a transition, even before subsequent historical assessments of a government’s policies. However, for those most closely involved at the heart of government, and for new governments entering office, the main test is effectiveness; how quickly a new government is able to get to grips with office and implement its plans. Good preparation can ensure a new minster and a department work more closely and more harmoniously together than they might otherwise do, and develop a better relationship sooner (Riddell and Haddon, 2009).
There are three uneasy participants in the marriage – the incumbent Government, the permanent Civil Service, and the Opposition (the government-in-waiting) – with a variety of interested, and vocal, onlookers in the media, think tanks, pressure groups, consultants, business, trade unions, and so on.
The Civil, and other, services are intended to be impartial, yet loyal to the Government of the day. Trust is, therefore, fundamental between current ministers and their senior civil servants. But it has been tested, at times severely, by Civil Service preparations for an alternative government, and any contacts, approved although covert, with the main Opposition party. It is a world of ambiguity and secretiveness rather than clarity and candour.
The effectiveness of transitions can be measured in several ways: are the incoming Government and the Civil Service adequately prepared to be up and running soon; is the new Government able to understand and begin using the levers of power quickly; is there a hiatus as new ministers and the Civil Service take time to get the measure of each other? (Riddell and Haddon, 2009).
The aim of Opposition parties is to win as many seats as possible at the next general election and to be able to form a government. Everything else is secondary. In practice, the behavior of Opposition parties depends on the political and electoral circumstances. Parties still, however, go through the motions of policy preparations, not least to convey the impression that they are a credible alternative government.
Some parties have no realistic hope of returning to power in the immediate future. But there are many ways in which the process of transition can be improved.
On March 28 and 29, 2015 Nigeria held democratic elections. Muslim Muhammad Buhari, head of All Progressives Congress, was elected president of the first African power. Such event had a great impact both inside and outside the country, since it is taking place in one of the most tumultuous periods since the establishment of democracy in 1999. Fortunately, polling days proceeded without violence mostly in all 36 Nigerian states, except for the northwestern region, where Boko Haram killed at least 41 people and scared hundreds of voters from polling stations. Nevertheless, and spite of its despicable effort, Boko Haram did not succeed in boycotting the electoral process, thanks to the strong presence of military forces, and the Nigerians’ strong determination to be heard in such significant polls for their country. However, almost 30 million Nigerians went to the polls during these two days —15.4 million voted for Buhari, while 12.9 million chose to reelect Christian President Goodluck Jonathan, leader of People’s Democratic Party. As forecasts predicted, electoral results have been very narrow and have left many positive lessons for history, as well as a tangible optimism among Nigerians and a few reasons to believe that Buhari will work on the country’s stability. Stability in Nigeria is necessary for the region and the whole African continent. In Buhari’s words, “we have shown the world that we are people who have embraced democracy, who are seeking for a Government for the people, by the people and of the people.” Such process could become an example for other African nations. During the electoral campaign, and especially after the elections were postponed due to Boko Haram’s attacks, insecurity has flown across such a relevant political process. Nevertheless, elections have been free, fair and pacific, as Jonathan risked promising, and results have democratically changed power in Nigeria for the first time. To a large extent, both candidates’ attitude towards the results has been decisive for preventing violence among voters, unlike what happened in the 2011 elections. Back then, conflicts in several northern regions in Nigeria resulted in over 800 casualties. Jonathan’s forcefulness after his defeat —“nobody’s ambition is worth the blood of any Nigerian”, and Buhari’s peaceful spirit as the winner —“I extend a hand of friendship and conciliation to President Jonathan” — calmed the first confrontations among their supporters and sealed an electoral process that must remain in the collective memory of Nigerians.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The peaceful and generally accepted handover of power from one party to another following a general election is one of the hallmarks of a democratic system.
On the Civil Service side, the prospect of a new administration means potential changes in government machinery, practices and personnel, as well as policy. Unless, and until, a dissolution of Parliament occurs, preparation is constrained both by the requirement to continue to serve the government of the day and by uncertainty about Opposition plans, aggravated by the lack of direct contacts. So the Civil Service has often had to guess what the Opposition proposals mean, or work on the basis of indirect contacts and party statements and manifesto pledges intended as much as for internal party or electoral consumption as a program for government itself.
1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. What are the problems of handing over power to another political party on the Civil service?
2. What influence does handing over of power to another government on Nigeria citizens?
3. Is there any significant relationship between handing over power from PDP to APC on Nigeria economy growth?
1.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The aim of this study is to critically study the consequences of handing over power to a government from a different political party to another. The objectives are:
1. To find out the problems of handing over power to another political party
2. What influence does handing over of power to another government on Nigeria citizens?
3. To find out if there is any significant relationship between handing over power from PDP to APC on Nigeria economy growth?
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The study shall provide a source of information on the consequences of handing over power to president Buhari of the APC from president Goodluck of the PDP in 2015 on the civil service.
1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The idea of the research work is to examine if there are consequences to the handing of power to a different government from a different political party to another on the civil service during the 2015 general elections where the PDP lost the presidency to the APC.
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS
GOVERNMENT: A group of people that governs a community or unit. It sets and administers public policy and exercises executive, political and economical powers.
POLITICS: The activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially between parties having power.
POLITICAL PARTY: A group of persons organized to acquire and exercise political power.
CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT: The replacement of one government regime with another through elections.
ELECTION: Election is the formal process of selecting a person for public or accepting or rejecting a political position.
1.8 ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY
This research work is organized in five chapters, for easy understanding, as follows Chapter one is concerned with the introduction, which consist of the (overview, of the study), historical background, statement of problem, objectives of the study, research hypotheses, significance of the study, scope and limitation of the study, definition of terms and historical background of the study. Chapter two highlights the theoretical framework on which the study is based, thus the review of related literature. Chapter three deals on the research design and methodology adopted in the study. Chapter four concentrate on the data collection and analysis and presentation of finding. Chapter five gives summary, conclusion, and recommendations made of the study.
USE THIS MATERIALS AS A GUIDE FOR YOUR PERSONAL RESEARCH WORK (IF PROPERLY CITED)
PAY ₦3,000 HERE TO DOWNLOAD MATERIALS
Account Number: 0709546102
Access Bank: Savings
Account Name: Emmanuel Idorenyin Samuel.